Steve Jobs The Success Story Essay - 875 Words

â€Å"Every once in a while, a revolutionary product came along, that changes everything, and Apple has been †¦ very fortunate; it’s been able to introduce a few of these into the world. â€Å" (â€Å"Steve Jobs introducing the iPhone†) What continued was a loud cheering and clapping by the attendant of the Apple 2007 keynote, one of the most important events held by Apple, the world’s current most valuable company (â€Å"The Worlds Most Valuable Brands†) where Apple introduced the first iPhone. The voice of the man was Steve Job, the former CEO Apple. Born on February 24, 1955 in San Francisco, California, he was often credited for the success behind Apple’s products. However, not many people know the truth behind Steve Jobs and the real work†¦show more content†¦In April 1,1976, Jobs and Wozniak officially started Apple computer. Their first computer was a great success. One of their products, Apple II, was a huge success and made Apple Founders millionaires. Their success came from the computers they invented that were easy to use. But it was the introduction of Lisa that mark the revolution that Apple has brought to the industry. In 1979, Jobs was very impressed with the technology called the Graphical User Interphase (GUI) and created Lisa with that technology. However, because of his temper, he was kicked out of the Lisa project and as a revenge, he started a new project called the Macintosh. However, in 1985, sales dropped and Steve tried to convince the director to kick the current CEO out, but no one sided with Steve an kicked him out. He was really sad and tried to start a new company with some ex-Apple employees. In 1988, NeXT was created and was not successful and therefore, Steve bought computer graphic division from Lucas Film and started Pixar. Pixar made a short cartoon movie Tin Toy in 1989 and won an Academy Award. In 1995, Pixar released another movie called Toy Story which was a box office success. Steve later became a billionaire. In the meantime, Apple wasnt performing well because Microsoft had just released Windows 95 so the sale of the Macintosh computer crashed. Knowing this, Steve Jobs convinced Apple to buy NeXT forShow MoreRelatedThe Success Story Of Steve Jobs With Apple Phones1935 Words   |  8 Pagesbest place to start was through the smartphone market. Their products have often been criticized as copies of Apple phones. Inspired by the success story of Steve Jobs with Apple, Lei Jun saw similar opportunities in China as the technology and internet related markets were becoming popular with the general public. He is often described as China’s Steve Jobs and while there are many similarities between the two, there are also key differences. Most of the similarities are superficial, such has theRead MoreSteve Jobs : The Man Who Thought1616 Words   |  7 PagesKnown as the man who thought â€Å"different,† Steve Jobs was a very passionate entrepreneur, innovator, and leader who did not give up on his dreams. He was very dedicated to his work, and a self-made billionaire, but his story doesn’t start there. In 1994, a young college woman by the name of Joanne Schieble became pregnant. The father of her child was Syrian, so Joanne’s father did not agree with them being married. During this time it was also frowned upon to be a single mother, so Joanne proceededRead MorePersonal Statement : Steve Jobs1119 Words   |  5 PagesCOMM 2113-005 Prof. Jonathan Gutierrez Steve Jobs, born February 24 1955 in the city of San Francisco, was a man well known for his contributions to our technical world. As mentioned during his introduction at the Stanford Commencement Speech in 2005, as an infant Jobs was given up for adoption by his biological parents and was later adopted by a couple known as Clara and Paul Jobs. As a boy, Jobs acquired an interest in electronics as Paul Jobs showed his son how to take apart and reconstructRead MoreSteve Jobs : A Engineer Of The Highest Calibre1602 Words   |  7 Pagesproducts that many people use. Who was this person? That person was Steve Jobs, the famous inventor and co-founder of Apple. He was born in San Francisco, California on February 24, 1955 and died on October 5, 2011. Most people know Steve Jobs for his work at Apple and his â€Å"Stevenotes,† which were his keynote speeches where he introduced new products and technologies. Throughout his life, he accomplished many admirable things. Steve Jobs is admirable because of his help in starting Apple Computer, hisRead MoreRhetorical Analysis Of Steve Jobs Commencement Speech929 Words   |  4 PagesHarmon 1 A Rhetorical Analysis of Steve Jobs Commencement Speech for Stanford Universitys Graduating Class of 2005: Jobs titled his speech Youve got to find what you love. Steve Jobs is best known as an American entrepreneur, inventor and industrial designer. He was the cofounder, chairman and CEO of Apple Inc. and founder, CEO and chairman of Pixar Animation Studios. Jobs and cofounder of Apple Inc. Steve Wozniak are wildly recognized as pioneers of the microcomputer revolution of the 1970sRead MoreSteve Jobs Speech Draft : Steve Job944 Words   |  4 PagesSteve Jobs Speech Draft Steve Job’s was one of the most successful men in the world. He accomplished many things in his life before he lost his bout with cancer. Jobs, ironically himself a college dropout, presented the 2005 commencement speech at Stanford University that was both inspiring and gave people a look into how he became the man that he was. I believe Steve Jobs speech is somewhat awkward due to his audience, utilizes the art of storytelling to engage his audience, and utilizes hisRead MoreReaction Paper for Pirates of the Silicon Valley1057 Words   |  5 Pagescomputer evolution, I was like oh no! for sure this will serve as my sleeping pill for today. But as the story goes, it is very interesting, very inspiring that makes me want to know more about Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. The movie Pirates of Silicon Valley is a film based on the book Fire in the Valley: The Making of the Personal Computer by Paul Freiberger. The movie took off w/ Steve Jobs talking to a director, which happened in the middle of a commercial for Apple Computer. The commercialRead MoreApples Success And Success1409 Words   |  6 PagesAPPLE SUCCESS METHODS 1 APPLE SUCCESS METHODS Success is a goal of every business. There are few companies that enjoy success the way Apple, Inc does. Fortune Magazine does an Annual ranking of the best companies by revenue known as the Fortune 500. Making it into these top 500 companies is somethin g that is truly to be coveted as being listed among this shows that you are part of the most successful business. In 2015, Apple made it into the Fortune 5 (Fortune 500 List) . MeaningRead MoreSteve Jobs : An Innovator And Visionary1068 Words   |  5 Pagestechnology, Steve Jobs’ accomplishments can be held on a pedestal with the likes of Bill Gates, Larry Paige, Sergey Brin and Mark Zuckerberg to name a few. All highly regarded in technology for shaping consumerism and how the individuals access to information has transformed. Predominantly known as CEO of Apple before his tragic death, Steve Jobs has had a profound effect on the world outside of consumer products. From the inception of the iPod to smartphones and tablets, Steve Jobs has been widelyRead MoreSteve Jobs: A Most Influential and Inspirational Man Essay619 Words   |  3 PagesSteve Jobs, the co-founder of Apple, is considered by many as one of the most influential minds in the technology industry. Through a plethora of Apple Keynote presentations as well as speeches, Jobs was able to share his passion with others. I have watched many of Jobs speeches on YouTube. One of his most w ell-known speech and one of my favorites that I saw on YouTube is his 2005 Stanford Commencement Address. Here, he shared his passion through retelling his remarkable past. His message was to

Patrick Dwyer Free Essays

Where The Wild Things Are As humans we instinctively feel the need and desire to belong. When we truly belong to something we achieve a sense of acceptance, love and togetherness. ‘Where The Wild Things Are’ by Maurice Sendak is a children’s book that explores the concepts of belonging and in contrast, not belonging. We will write a custom essay sample on Patrick Dwyer or any similar topic only for you Order Now It is a very simple story accompanied by large, rich pictures. The text and pictures complement each other, each enriching the sense of alienation for the responder. Max is a mischievous young boy who displays aspects of childhood irritation and loneliness. He lives in a world with limited freedom as he is a child. It becomes clear to the responder through the positioning of the character on the page, the vector of the boy’s angry gaze as well as the neutral, bland colours used that Max feels like he doesn’t belong in the world he calls home. The pictures at the beginning of the story are quite unengaging compared to the bright, richly textured pages that follow. This sense of not belonging leads to Max fantasising and creating a whole new world within his imagination. In this world Max is king, there is no one to tell him what to do and how he must act. In this place Max is completely accepted and the most important part of the wild things world. Max wears a wolf suit during the story, it shows the responder that Max is disguising who he really is and that the suit enables him to escape from reality. Whilst Max is wearing this suit he becomes a wild thing and he thinks that his behaviour is acceptable. Max is pushing his family away, but he is also wishing to obtain a sense of belonging, love and acceptance. He finds this sense of belonging with his new wild friends. Throughout the text, the composer portrays a range of emotions felt by Max. He finally gets what he wants, a place of unlimited freedom and acceptance, but still is not happy. He needs to be â€Å"where someone loves him best of all†. So he returns to the comfort and familiarity of his bedroom, where his mum had left his supper, still warm. Framing is an important visual element of ‘Where The Wild Things Are’ as Max’s imagination grows, the illustrations get larger until they fill the whole page. Early in the book, before Max’s imagination takes him to the land of the wild things, we see a hand drawn picture of a wild thing hanging on his wall. He has thought about the wild things before and has been forming a plan in his mind. Max has often felt like he doesn’t belong and has imagined belonging somewhere else, in an imaginary world where he makes all the rules and is king. The text regularly refers to Max as ‘king’, but he doesn’t appear to be enjoying his job much. He looks sad, bored and lonely and begins to long for his home, which is a place where he does belong. ‘Where The Wild Things Are’ links quite closely to the set text ‘Romulus, My Father’. Both texts contain an informative tone and both contain the central theme of belonging. Both texts use imagery to represent the sense of not belonging, which then leads to belonging. In ‘Where The Wild Things Are’ the lack of belonging is shown through Max’s escape from reality, but then the sense of belonging is shown through Max’s desire to return home, to which he realises is where he belongs. This links to the set text ‘Romulus, My Father’ where the lack of belonging is shown through Romulus’s inability to reduce the cultural barrier between him and the rest of the community, but then the sense of belonging is shown when the community look at how hard Romulus works and therefore appreciate him, in which he belongs. By Pat Dwyer How to cite Patrick Dwyer, Papers

Justice as Fairness Entitlement Justice for Theory

Question: John Rawlss argument for Justice as fairness and Robert Nozicks argument for Entitlement justice for theory.' Answer: Introduction In terms of administrative fairness, the justice theory seems to vary according to different cultures. The justice seems to be influenced by the individual agreement on the various aspects. There are various theorists like John Rawls, Robert Nozick both who developed several theories on justice such as theories of distributive justice. In this essay, John Rawls Justice as fairness and Robert Nozicks Entitlement justice for theory are illustrated so that the superior theory among these two can be rightfully identified with the help of ample number of justified reasons. Discussion Insofar the background of the justice of fairness is concerned; it seems to be the favorable environment where the basic demands of every citizen can be fulfilled. According to Najafpour, Sara, and Hossein Harsin, the Justice as fairness by John Rawls Indicates that in order to develop a liberal society in both the social and political institutions, it is important to do an arrangement of a proper structure in the legal, political, social, economic systems. With the help of this basic structure, these systems can distribute their benefits and positive impacts among its citizens like their fundamental rights, social recognition, financial benefits etc. The basic structure of the society effectively influences the goals, objectives, characters, attitudes and the prospects of lives of the citizens. As the citizens cannot leave a society, after being unable to cope with the structure, they are forced to live in that particular structure only. The basic concept of the theory of John Rawls suggests that the idea of social cooperation seems to be the combination of both positive and negative aspects. Rawls indicates that to lead a decent life, the individuals need to have proper assistance from their societies. Even there should be a particular technique with which the facilities and benefits will be distributed among them (Rawls, John, page no. 233). The negative idea of this theory mainly includes the fact that no individual is determined to be poor or rich, male or female, born in the favorable racial group etc. Therefore, no individual can get extra facility or disadvantages from the social institutions. On the other hand, the positive idea includes the fact that it is basically an equal reciprocal system where the benefits and facilities are supposed to be distributed among all citizens in appropriate manner. It mainly focuses on the concept that all the citizens are equal fundamentally which ensures the equal distribut ion of all the facilities. The proper justice lies on this idea that the goods, produced in the collective manner need to be distributed among all citizens. Moreover, even if the inequalities happen, that should benefit the demands of the citizens who strongly require them. Based on his discussion of the original position and the value and ignorance, Rawls believes that people will choose two principles to distribute justice. The first principle indicates that every person has the right to claim the appropriate amount of equal rights like other citizens to have an adequate lifestyle. The demand needs to be compatible with the sense of liberty. On the other hand, as per the viewpoint of Rawls, John, the second principle indicates to the two specific conditions such as the economic and social conditions need to be applicable to different official positions so that every employee can get the equal opportunity for further improvement and they need to provide maximum equal benefits to the non-advance society members. Therefore, it can be said that the first principle is typically related to the advantages of the political institution while the second principle is highly connected with the economic system. The first principle includes the priority which seems to decide the distribution of similar facilities among employees and the appropriate value of the liberties related to the political institution. The second principle also has two different parts. The fair distribution of opportunity and equality among all the citizens that gives them opportunities to acquire their desired educational qualification and economic opportunities regardless of their class and status. The second part is the principle of differences with which the distribution of wealth and income are distributed. It regulates the inequalities which work for the benefits of worst offs. By assuring this in the society, Rawls reimburses for the naturally happening inequalities like the born talents. Robert Nozicks Entitlement justice for theory indicates the distribution of private property and justice among ordinary people. There are three constituting principles of this theory. The first principle indicates to the primary acquisition perspectives of the ordinary people. The second principle is about the procedure with which one individual acquires holding from other individual by an exchange of power. The third principle suggests the acquainting power with which one individual tries to adjust in a situation where the holding of power is distributed unjustly. The first principle indicates self-ownership of each person, that every human being is the owner of their own talents, bodies and abilities. Therefore, they also have the right to the produced product or services by their talent. It also indicates at the labor holding seems to be illegitimate because no individual can be owned by other individual. The second principle indicates that it is the responsibility of every individual to protect the basic life, property and liberty without seeking the help of any military force or police. This process can consume huge time and cost. From the viewpoint of Letseka, Moeketsi, in order to reduce the chances for further violation of the rights by the involvement of other individuals, as per this theory, every individual needs to protect their own rights. Robert Nozick argues that the employment of other agencies reduce the effectiveness of this acquiring process. However, Fraser, Colin R opined that the distributive justice method of this theory includes some external forces who seem to be responsible for the distribution of rights among individuals. Their efforts give them the right to claim the shares of the individuals among whom the shares are distributed. According to Robert Nozick, every theory includes a starting points and transformational processes with which the theories embrace whatever result comes out. However, he criticizes that principle generating principle of Rawlss theory does not have the ability to process principles. It only aims to identify end result principle. Robert Nozick criticises that this fact of Rawlss theory seems to be very ironic because it seems great but cannot give a proper justification behind selecting the outcome of its results (Wndisch, Joachim). Robert Nozick also argues against the principle of difference of Rawlss theory in which it is mentioned that no individual is that worse so that it can be controlled by other individual. Robert Nozick rejects this concept but cannot provide any other baseline for it and also does not provide the criteria for the people to be controlled by other. Moreover, for this principle, he also argues that it the social cooperation for the benefit of all members of the society cannot determine the advantages of the less-advanced society members in comparison to their other successful mates. However, based on my argument, these flaws cannot be regarded as the actual backdrops of the theory of Rawls. Insofar as the first principle of this theory is concerned, Robert Nozick also agrees with the fact of liberty which every individual need to get. Robert Nozick also admits the openion of Rawlss theory regarding the redistribution process of wealth by government among individuals. He admits that his theory does not fulfill the criteria of wealth distribution among people. Rather, the difference principle of Rawlss theory helps to increase the possibility of the less advantage receiver people and the previous injustice victims by rectifying the wealth distribution process. However, the previous criticism of Robert Nozick regarding the difference principle is very weak because he rejects this theory but cannot be able to provide another proper view which can prove its insufficiency. For this reason, I think, Rawlss theory already has owned some advantages over the theory of Rob ert Nozick. In addition to that, Rawlss theory tends to increase the success rate of society by increasing the benefits and opportunities of individuals and also tries to maximize the outcomes. Though it has little care about the practical implementation of the human nature, it mainly covers the basic needs and demands of the people and also recommends measure for maximizing the opportunities of the victims of injustice. For this reason, I prefer the justifications of Rawlss theory which clearly elaborates the structure and their effectiveness by illustrating the principles and their sub-parts. Conclusion In this way, both the theories of John Rawlss Justice as fairness and Robert Nozicks Entitlement justice for theory are analyzed critically in order to identify the most effective theory in comparison to the other. The analysis has been done from the perspective of John Rawls which strengthen the fact of equal distribution of power among each and every citizen. This theory mainly promotes the protection of self-ownership of every citizen along with the equal distribution of all available facilities among them. However, the modern scientists needs to work more on strongly establishing the fact of Rawls in which he claims that benefit of all citizen can increase the potentiality of the improvement of non-advanced citizens. Rawls does not prove this fact with proper justification for which the researchers need to provide ample umber of practical examples. Reference List Fraser, Colin R. "John Rawls, Robert Nozick, and the Difference Principle: Finding Common Ground."Inquiries Journal3.04 (2011) Lawrence, Michael Anthony. "'Justice-as-Fairness' as Judicial Guiding Principle: Remembering John Rawls and the Warren Court." (2015) Letseka, Moeketsi. "Ubuntu and justice as fairness."Mediterranean journal of social sciences5.9 (2014): 544 Najafpour, Sara, and Hossein Harsij. "The Impact of Rawls and MacIntyre Theory of Justice on National Cohesion in Multicultural Societies."International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences3.7 (2013): 202 Rawls, John. "Justice as fairness: political not metaphysical."Philosophy Public Affairs(1985): 223-251 Wndisch, Joachim. "Nozicks proviso: Misunderstood and misappropriated."Rationality, Markets and Morals4.79 (2013)